Stock Beta

A measure of risk - or volatility?


Stock beta is a measure of the price volatility of a stock compared to the rest of the market.

It answers the question: How does the stock’s price move relative to the overall market?

But is stock beta a measure of risk - which is usually assumed? The following discussion considers this question.


Calculating and Interpreting Beta

Beta calculation is performed using a statistical technique called regression analysis. The whole market is assigned a beta of 1.

Stocks that have a beta greater than 1 have greater price volatility than the overall market and are considered to have greater risk.

Stocks with a beta of 1 move up and down with the market.

Stocks with a beta less than 1 have less price volatility than the market as a whole and are considered to have less risk.

Risk relates to return. Investors normally expect that stocks with a higher beta should command a risk premium, that is provide a higher return than the market.

More risk should mean more reward!

So the argument runs like this ...

If the market with a beta of 1 is expected to return 8%, a stock with a beta of 1.5 should return 12%.

If you don’t see that level of return, then the stock is not a good investment possibility.

Stocks with a beta below 1 should be a safer investment, assuming you define risk as volatility. So you should expect a lower return.

A stock’s beta can also be compared to the average beta for its industry sector to get a picture of whether the stock has a different volatility compared to its industry.

My online broker provides a beta value for each stock, and for its sector.


Considerations When Using beta

Factors to take into account about the use of beta as a measure of risk include ...

  • beta is based on historical data that is not always an accurate predictor of the future volatility of the stock
  • beta does not take into account any new initiatives being undertaken by a company such as acquisitions that may alter the price volatility of the stock
  • whether beta as a measure of volatility has any credible relationship with risk for your investment time horizon
  • the best use of the beta ratio may be in short-term buying and selling, where price volatility is important.

To Conclude

For long-term value investing, the beta has little relevance. Value investors are more concerned with a company’s fundamentals.

This particularly relates to estimating the company's intrinsic value to provide an approximate means of assessing the risk of buying the stock at a particular price level.

Value investors reject the idea of beta as a measure of risk because it implies that a stock that has fallen sharply in price is more risky than it was before it fell.

A value investor would argue that a company represents a lower-risk investment after its stock has fallen in price, assuming they are still happy with its fundamentals.


For the value investor, buying a stock below its intrinsic value would imply less risk and buying it at a price above the intrinsic value would imply greater risk.

So beta is more relevant to short-term price risk which is a minor concern for value investors.

Return from Stock Beta to Safe Investing

Return to Value Investing Home Page

Search This Site



Welcome

I'm John and these are my grand kids. Welcome to my site.

Click here to read my background with value stock investing. I hope you find suggestions in my site that make you a successful value investor.





Review www.make-money-stock-value-investing.com on alexa.com