![]() |
|||
![]() |
For example, if the market with a beta of 1 is expected to return 8%, a stock with a beta of 1.5 should return 12%. If you don’t see that level of return, then the stock is not a good investment possibility. Stocks with a beta below 1 should be a safer investment, assuming you define risk as volatility. So you should expect a lower return. A stock’s beta can also be compared to the average beta for its sector to get a picture of whether the stock is out of line with its industry. My online broker provides a beta value for each stock, and for its sector. Factors to take into account about the use of beta as a measure of risk include ...
For long-term value investors, the beta has little relevance. Value investors are more concerned with a company’s fundamentals. This particularly relates to estimating its intrinsic value to provide an approximate means of assessing the risk of buying the stock at a particular price level. Value investors reject the idea of beta because it implies that a stock that has fallen sharply in value is more risky than it was before it fell. A value investor would argue that a company represents a lower-risk investment after it falls in value. For the value investor, buying a stock below its intrinsic value would imply less risk and buying it at a price above the intrinsic value would imply greater risk.
So beta is more relevant to short-term risk which is not a concern for value investors.
Return from Stock Beta to Investment Risk |
||